<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Josh Mehlman &#187; Jamie Briggs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mehlman.info/tag/jamie-briggs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mehlman.info</link>
	<description>Editor, writer and online strategist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cracks emerging in the filter facade</title>
		<link>http://mehlman.info/2009/12/cracks-emerging-in-the-filter-facade/</link>
		<comments>http://mehlman.info/2009/12/cracks-emerging-in-the-filter-facade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[f___ing censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shameless self promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Hawke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cowardice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Briggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Lundy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penny Sharpe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZDNet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mehlman.info/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal government&#8217;s internet censorship announcement is only three days old but already dissent is emerging from some unexpected places. Perhaps also not emerging from some expected ones. I&#8217;ve been...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal government&#8217;s internet censorship announcement is only three days old but already dissent is emerging from some unexpected places. Perhaps also not emerging from some expected ones. I&#8217;ve been following the story for ZDNet.</p>
<p>New South Wales upper-house member Penny Sharpe <a href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/First-Labor-politician-breaks-filter-ranks/0,130061791,339300098,00.htm">railed against the filter in her blog</a>. Yes, she is from the Labor party, but the NSW and federal arms aren&#8217;t exactly best buddies right now.</p>
<p>Three younger Liberal parliamentarians &#8211; MPs Alex Hawke and Jamie Briggs and Senator Simon Birmingham &#8211; have also <a href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/Several-Liberal-MPs-oppose-filter/0,130061791,339300117,00.htm">come out against the filter</a>, although this is mainly confirming their previous positions. Most interestingly, Hawke says he has advised the Christian lobby against the filter proposal, even though he is himself a Christian.</p>
<p>As I mentioned the other day, Senator Kate Lundy has been painfully fence sitting. Despite her well known and vociferous opposition to internet filtering while she was in opposition, <a href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/Lundy-My-filter-views-well-known-/0,130061791,339300083,00.htm">Lundy wouldn&#8217;t say much at all</a> when I spoke to her. Subsequently she posted <a href="http://www.katelundy.com.au/2009/12/17/my-thoughts-on-the-filter/">a lengthy piece on her blog</a>, the gist of which was that she opposed filtering but it was Labor policy before the election, we voted for them and she can&#8217;t speak against party policy.</p>
<p>Although there is still an open question about whether Labor&#8217;s pre-election policy made it clear the filter would be mandatory &#8211; the language was pretty fluffy.</p>
<p>While these small brushstrokes begin to paint of picture of widespread opposition to the filter, no one seems to have an overall idea of how the anti-censorship movement might achieve its goals. Stay tuned&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mehlman.info/2009/12/cracks-emerging-in-the-filter-facade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

