politics Archive

0

Bush to Mugabe: rigging elections is bad

US President George W Bush has criticised Zimbabwean dictator Robert Mugabe for not releasing the results of last month’s election.

” . . . you can’t have elections unless you’re willing to put the results out. What kind of election is it if you not let the will of the people be known?” Bush told reporters after a White House meeting with British PM Gordon Brown.

George W should perhaps have consulted his diaries for 7 November 2000, or thereabouts, before making statements of this kind.

But I suppose, it makes sense. George W rigs elections, nobbles the media, spies on his citizens, imprisons and tortures people without trial, abuses human rights and keeps poor black people in third-world conditions while ruining the economy to corruptly enrich a cadre of cronies and insiders, blaming all the country’s ills on a nebulous foreign bogeyman.

Whereas Mugabe . . . ?

1

Bob Carr: genius

Former NSW premier Bob Carr was often criticised for being too cosy with business. Especially with the development of large infrastructure projects such as the Sydney Airport railway line, Cross-City Tunnel and Lane Cove Tunnel, many believe Carr ignored the interests of citizens to get better deals for his mates in construction and investment banking.

However, recent events have revealed Carr’s true nature: a socialist subversive, intent on swindling the corporate fat cats for the benefit of the good people of New South Wales.

What all these projects have in common, the latest being the Lane Cove Tunnel,  was that once these projects failed to achieve their ridiculously inflated income projections, the investors wrote off the billions they spent or sold off their stakes at a drastically reduced price.

This was all a deliberate strategy on Carr’s part. He was willing to wear the endless criticisms of being a capitalist stooge and big-business crony, because deep down he knew that within a few years, he would effectively have given the citizens of this great state a beautiful gift: free roads and railways!

What better way to build infrastructure than to con a bunch of investment bank money men, lured by false and unachievable promises of revenue, into paying for it?

Cost to taxpayer: zip. Cost to business: who cares?

It’s no wonder Bob went straight from Sussex St to Macquarie Bank. After the people of NSW helped themselves to such an enormous free dinner, Bob’s going to have to wash a lot of dishes to make up for it.

1

Slightly faster broadband

Minister for Broadband Stephen Conroy yesterday delivered the exciting news that the government’s planned $4.7 billion broadband network would deliver speeds “up to 100 times faster than what is currently available”. Sounds great!

It will achieve this by running fibre-optic connections to the telecommunications pillar mushrooms on street corners then using VDSL (very fast digital something something else) to deliver speeds of up to 25Mbps to homes.

Call me a pedant if you must, but that’s not 100 times faster than what’s currently available. I may be decaf soy latte drinking inner city elite, but I get around 19Mbps using ADSL2 and living about a kilometre from my phone exchange. I’m no maths genius, but I’m pretty sure 25Mbps is not 100 times faster than 19Mpbs. In fact I’d say it something closer to 1.3 times faster.

But Senator Conroy’s calculation is based on the claim that “most broadband users currently receive only 256 kilobits per second”. Which is

  • A lie – statistics more than a year old show two-thirds of broadband users on faster than 256Kbps and
  • A damning criticism of how Conroy’s predecessors let Telstra and the rest of the internet industry deliberately retard broadband access and make obscene profits.

Seems like when it comes to technology, the new federal government is as pompous and incompetent as the last.

3

Barack the Builder – can we fix it?

During the recent Australian federal election campaign, Herald columnist Annabel Crabb lamented that both party leaders were helping police with their inquiries into the death of political oratory.

I may the last person in the world to have noticed, but the same can not be said for the US elections. A prime example is Barack Obama’s rousing words in New Hampshire last month . . .

We know the battle ahead will be long. But always remember that, no matter what obstacles stand in our way, nothing can stand in the way of the power of millions of voices calling for change.

We have been told we cannot do this by a chorus of cynics. And they will only grow louder and more dissonant in the weeks and months to come.

We’ve been asked to pause for a reality check. We’ve been warned against offering the people of this nation false hope. But in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope.

For when we have faced down impossible odds, when we’ve been told we’re not ready or that we shouldn’t try or that we can’t, generations of Americans have responded with a simple creed that sums up the spirit of a people: Yes, we can. Yes, we can. Yes, we can.

It was a creed written into the founding documents that declared the destiny of a nation: Yes, we can.

It was whispered by slaves and abolitionists as they blazed a trail towards freedom through the darkest of nights: Yes, we can.

It was sung by immigrants as they struck out from distant shores and pioneers who pushed westward against an unforgiving wilderness: Yes, we can.

It was the call of workers who organized, women who reached for the ballot, a president who chose the moon as our new frontier, and a king who took us to the mountaintop and pointed the way to the promised land: Yes, we can, to justice and equality.

Yes, we can, to opportunity and prosperity. Yes, we can heal this nation. Yes, we can repair this world. Yes, we can.

And so, tomorrow, as we take the campaign south and west, as we learn that the struggles of the textile workers in Spartanburg are not so different than the plight of the dishwasher in Las Vegas, that the hopes of the little girl who goes to the crumbling school in Dillon are the same as the dreams of the boy who learns on the streets of L.A., we will remember that there is something happening in America, that we are not as divided as our politics suggest, that we are one people, we are one nation.

And, together, we will begin the next great chapter in the American story, with three words that will ring from coast to coast, from sea to shining sea: Yes, we can.

Or if you have a short attention span, you can watch the Black Eyed Peas’ celebrity-studded music video of the speech. No, for real. And while you’re at it, read the 2,500-odd illiterate, pigheaded, uneducated, self-important ejaculations from the American public in the comments section. Viva Web 2.0!

1

Google outspends Australia 20:1 on renewable energy

Earlier this week, Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin pledged to spend “hundreds of millions”, in the long run, on renewable energy research and projects in an initiative called RE<C (renewable energy cheaper than coal) (nerds).

The project’s eventual aim is to build one gigawatt of renewable energy capacity that is cheaper than coal. This is enough to power “a city the size of San Francisco”. (Though not, it seems, the actual city of San Francisco. Perhaps a city the size of San Francisco in a poorer country without all the energy-hogging fat Westerners in it.)

Anyhoo, a laudable aim, for sure, even if some cynical media types have pointed out Google’s interest is not entirely philanthropic, given its reliance on vast datacentres chock full of electricity-sucking servers.

By contrast, former PM Howard, even in über-generous election fire-sale mode, could only manage $75 million for renewables.  And commie Big Kev’s $500 million might only equal Google’s investments. Just for comparison, Google earned US$10.6 billion in 2006 (around $12 billion Oz); the Australian government ‘earned’ $232 billion in 2006-07.

A back-of-the-envelope calculation puts Google spending about 20 times more, as a proportion of revenue, than the Australian federal government on renewable energy. That’s taking into account the generous pledges of the Labor federal government that just got elected on its green credentials.

Seems like if there’s to be any real action on global warming, it’s going to come from the people and the private sector – not wishy washy politicos . . . of any flavour.

0

Lachrymose hagiography

And the 2007 election award for lachrymose hagiography goes to, who’d have guessed, Miranda Devine for her post-mortem on Janette Howard’s First Ladyship. (I’ve added dictionary definition links in case any Miranda fans read this and need some help.)

Wee bit of a contradiction, though. Miranda claims the former First Frump’s . . .

. . . avid interest in politics, voracious consumption of media and accurate antenna for the public mood has made the 63-year-old former teacher Mr Howard’s most formidable adviser.

Yeeeees, except for the bit last year when she told him not to step aside for Peter Costello. Overstaying his welcome has been widely credited as one of the final nails in the conservative coffin. Janette evidently misread the public mood on that one rather badly. And if we needed any more evidence of her lack of touch with the common folk . . .

When an emotional young woman told her: “I can’t believe people could vote such a good government out,” she replied: “They just don’t remember what it was like before.”

Either that, or they do remember and got sick of having the place overrun with pea-brained conservative dinosaurs who, it seems, still have trouble accepting that everyone else in the country has moved on.

0

Paging Dr Freud

Yes, Kerry O’Brien really did describe the battle in Bennelong as “looking like a victory for the ABC”.

1

The sins of the spouse

Ah, the deliciousness . . . The Tories’ last gasps of electoral oxygen swallowed by the idiotic actions of boofhead party hacks, who may or may not have been the husbands of the current (retiring) MP for Lindsay Jackie Kelly and her Lib replacement Karen Chijoff.

One has to be particularly impressed with Kelly’s performance on AM this morning. “I’ve read the alleged pamphlet,” she starts off . . . Ummm. If you’ve read it, it’s not alleged; it’s real. She goes on to claim it’s really a very funny satirical joke. If you didn’t know better, you’d say she was drunk or stupid, or very, very sneaky. Good thing she’s retiring, eh?

The PM failed to see the funny side, though he added we shouldn’t blame wives for the (alleged) misdemeanours of their husbands.

It doesn’t automatically follow that because this lady’s husband may have done something foolish and wrong that that disentitles her from continuing. I think that would be unreasonable and would be out of step with contemporary society.

One couldn’t help but be reminded of when Big Kev was nearly crucified because his wife’s company (allegedly) underpaid some of its workers. One delighted at the prospect of revealing, yet again, the PM’s hypocrisy in defending the actions of one spouse while getting stuck into another. But the wily old fella, in the only public utterance I could find on the matter, actually said:

This issue, Mr Speaker, has got nothing to do, it’s got nothing to do with modern marriages, its got nothing to do whatever with conflicts of interest, it’s got everything to do with the hypocrisy and the double standards of the Australian Labor Party.

Consistency! And a not-unfashionable attitude! How galling!

Still, the man has made a virtue of plodding consistency, at least as a sugar-coating for being an evil, deceitful militant reactionary. Allegedly. He even told us not to vote him out of office because you can’t change government without changing the country. And they say he’s out of touch! But then he must be, because it hasn’t occurred to him that, as a nation, we might WANT to change. As Keating the Great put it:

Nations get a chance to change course every now and then. When things become errant, a wise country adjusts its direction. It understands that it is being granted an appointment with history. On this coming Saturday, this country should take that opportunity by driving a stake through the dark heart of Howard’s reactionary government.

0

Wait a minute . . .

Overloaded boat . . . offshore . . . engine not working . . . sinking . . . rescued by navy . . . children . . . fell into the water . . .

Surely they don’t think we’re going to fall for THAT one again?

0

Political activism

It recently became apparent that the people who moved in to the office opposite ours were the campaign staff for local MP Joe Hockey. (It became obvious when they put up some Joe Hockey campaign posters in the window facing mine.) To counter this visual pollution, I put up a (very mature) poster of my own.

Hockey poster

UPDATE (1.40pm): A quick call to local Labor candidate Mike Bailey‘s office very quickly netted us some hand-delivered and slightly less inappropriate replacements. Thanks guys!

Better posters

Update (22 November): Yesterday local Greens candidate Ted Nixon dropped off some posters and had a good yarn. He noted the Herald had reported a poll indicating Joe Hockey may need Greens preferences to retain the seat and indicated how likely he would be to direct his preferences that way (rather un-). We shall see.